Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Convenient Terrorists

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Sir Humphrey burst into the office, with a large grin on his face and rubbing his hands together with glee. “Have you seen the front page, Minister?”

“Yes, sir Humphrey. Man tried to blow up a plane. Terrible business.”

“On the contrary, Minister. It is most excellent news.”

“‘Excellent news’, Sir Humphrey?”

“Indeed, Minister.”

“But isn’t it a terrible threat to the national security? All these people trying to blow us up. What if one of them succeeds?”

“Good heavens, no, Minister. Don’t you see? These people are idiots. They might have blown up some aeroplanes in the past, but now all their good people are dead. Our friends in the foreign office have seen to that. No, we only allow just enough of them to cause just enough trouble.”

“‘Enough trouble?’ I’m not sure I like the sound of that.”

“Well, Minister, do you remember those ‘full body scanners’ Sir Jeffrey is so keen to install in the airports?”

“The ones that the public hate so much? The ones that take pictures of people in the nude?”

“The very ones. Well, Sir Jeffrey has mentioned that if we can find a way to get the prime minister to give them the go ahead, it will be very beneficial for his department, and he might just be inclined to return a similar favour to us.”

“You don’t mean…? Ah. Hmm. Well. Sir Humphrey?”

“Yes, Minister?”

“I have an idea. This attempted bombing in America. The Americans must be very worried about it.”

“Indeed they are. And whatever is a problem for the Americans is a problem for us.”

“Quite. Quite. I think it might be time for a full review of airport security. How quickly do you think you can do that?”

“Well it just so happens, Minister, that I have in my hand a draft review of airport security already written up. I’ve added a paragraph about the full body… er, what I mean to say, Minister is that I’ve already updated it with the latest developments. It would only need some tidying up.”

“Excellent work, Sir Humphrey. I’ll call the Prime Minister, and you get that report ready!”

“Yes, Minister.”

Internet Changes Everything

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

The Internet, in the form of a Facebook campaign, has influenced the pop charts by putting the dead cert for Christmas number 1 X Factor Winner into second place below a classic from rock band Rage Against The Machine.

If Internet people power can upset something as Important as the pop charts, watch out politicians, I say.

Concealed Flue Update

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

I previously wrote about a problem we had selling our flat when British Gas categorised the boiler system as “at risk” because of the concealed flue. We thought we would have to install inspection hatches, so managed to get hold of plans showing the route of the flue. I showed these to a British Gas engineer. He said:

  1. A concealed flue should be classified as “not to current standards” rather than “at risk”. He even called the office to check the policy on this.
  2. My colleague has been over-zealous by issuing an “at-risk” warning, our guidelines are to warn customers that concealed flues are “not to current standards”.
  3. The housing association should not have any trouble selling a property with a “not to current standards” warning. Nearly every property I visit is “not to current standards” for one reason or another.
  4. I have never seen a property with flue inspection hatches; I think this would be overkill.
  5. I recommend using carbon monoxide detectors.

He has given us paperwork to that effect, and the housing association are happy.

I think the lesson here is plenty of people are confused about concealed flues, so make sure that the people advising you have got their stories straight.

Concealed Flue

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

Update: the problem is solved.

Settle in. This is going to be complicated.

It started a few months ago when we had British Gas round to do their annual boiler inspection. They do this as part of their Homecare service. The man inspected the boiler and stuck a label on it saying, “WARNING. You are warned that this gas equipment has been classified as AT RISK. In the interest of safety please DO NOT USE IT until any faults have been remedied. DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL.

He explained that because our boiler is not mounted on an exterior wall, the flue runs through a void above the ceiling. As there is no way to inspect the flue, there is no way he can say that it is safe. So the boiler is not necessarily dangerous, but not necessarily safe either. He said we should get a carbon monoxide detector and went on his way.

Investigating this further, it turns out that the Health and Safety executive issued bulletins 200 and 235. These point out the dangers of concealed flues. What can happen is if the flue gets blocked or breaks, carbon monixide can leak out. The HSE doesn’t seem quite to know what to do about this, besides advising people of the risks and telling builders not to build flats like that any more. It advises residents with this problem to contact the builders of their properties. It advises builders to advise residents to contact gas people. It manages not to say anything very concrete. It does suggest installing inspection hatches so that the flue can be inspected, which is also what the gas man suggested.

Later, we decided to move. We live in a shared ownership flat. We own some of it and a housing association owns the rest. So to sell the flat they get an opportunity to sell it for us first.

On contacting them we explained about the boiler and they said that they could not sell the flat with this problem and we are on our own until it is fixed. It makes me wonder if they are able to re-sell any of their shared ownership flats and whether they even care about this.

We also established that we are solely responsible for any internal repairs. Read the small print if you are ever tempted by a shared ownership deal — words do not necessarily have their usual meanings.

Obviously we need to hire a builder to put hatches in the ceiling. But the gas man said the hatches must be in the right place so that the whole length of the flue can be inspected. So we contacted the builder, as advised by the HSE, to ask for plans to see find out where the flue goes. The builder said that as the building was built a long time ago, the plans are “archived”. This turns out to be a euphemism for “destroyed”.

There’s a possibility the housing association will have plans, but based on their general level of competence it seems unlikely.

Oh, we also contacted the National House Building Council who provide a warranty of sorts for our flat. Because it was built before the HSE issued their new guidelines they can’t help at all. The builders hadn’t done anything wrong at the time. Our real problem is that the HSE changed the rules under our feet.

I think what we really need to do is get the builder and the gas man to visit at the same time and not let them leave until everything is resolved.

In the meantime, we will try to get more information from the housing association. We can’t be the first people in the universe with this problem. Can we? Watch this space.

More Politics Show

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

Also on The Politics Show, we are to expect new legislation forcing us not to put our food waste in landfills. This all comes from EU legislation, we are told. I’ve already said everything I have to say about this, but note in particular the comment from Bruno Prior, who points out that it is the very taxing of landfill that reduces the amount of methane that is captured from landfills.

Then we are told to expect more legislation about smoking. Vending machines in pubs are to go and cigarettes must be sold from under the counter. Devil’s Kitchen has covered this endlessly.

Finally there was an item about ruckus in Manchester with the anti-muslim-extremists vs. UAF with their Socialist Worker banners. Viewers were asked, should people be able to stir up trouble and say whatever they want? The Tory in the studio went some way towards distinguishing between the speech and the violence. Arresting people who smash up property is about the most you can do, I would say. Manchester authorities wanted to ban the event but the Home Office said no. So far so good.

Only Connect

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

Just saw an item on The Politics Show about a charity called Only Connect who help people who come out of prison. The narrator actually said something like, “I can just hear you all at home saying, ‘this is typical BBC pinko stuff’”.

They then went on to bring politics into it, going on about how being nice to ex-criminals isn’t a vote winner. The notion that this is something that might well be A Good Thing when done and paid for privately, but not so much when the government forces everyone to pay for it, just doesn’t occur. *That’s* what’s pinko about the BBC.

Monza Qualifying with CoverItLive

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

I quite like the look of CoverItLive, a live blogging application. So I thought I’d try it out. I’ll be waffling on about the F1 qualifying here from 12.15.

Glenn Beck

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

I just saw on Fox News Glenn Beck talking about the National Endowment for the Arts, “an independent federal agency supporting artists and arts organizations and bringing the arts to all Americans.” He played a recording from a conference call in which the NEA seemed to be encouraging artists they were funding with tax money to create art that supported government policies. Sure enough, some of the artists on the call produced what looks a lot like anti-private healthcare propaganda.

Meanwhile CountingCats links to a video of Glenn Beck. In it, he points out that Obama said, if you want to know what kind I’m going to do and what kind of policies I will have, look to the people around me. Beck then points out all the links to Communism, Marxism and Hugo Chavez infatuation among the people Obama has installed in the Whitehouse. It’s fairly unsubtle stuff, like the Green Jobs Czar who co-founded a communist group call Storm who describe themselves thus: “We upheld the Marxist critique of capitalist exploitation. We agree with Lenin’s analysis of the state and the party, and we found inspiration and guidance in the insurgent revolutionary values developed by third-word revolutionaries like Mao Tse-Tung and Amilcar Cabral.” Nice.

Beck rants and raves a bit, and probably won’t convince anyone who doesn’t already agree with him, but he will provide some ammunition. And it’s nice to see a dissenting voice in the mainstream media. People dismiss Fox News because it’s biased, but everyone is biased and it would be nice to see someone on TV in the UK have a rant and a rave against progressives and socialists.

Who Raises Your Kids?

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

In Holland, the government decides whether your kids can sail around the world.

Caroline Vink, a senior adviser on youth protection in the Netherlands, said the case needed to be “looked into”.

“We’re talking about a 13-year-old,” she told the BBC. “You can also question whether she’s able to take this decision for herself, and whether the parents are making the decision in the best interests of Laura.”

In Germany, it is a legal requirement to go to school. If you don’t, your parents face fines and jail or you might get taken into care. The EU is fine with this; your “right” to education outweighs your right to raise your own children.

children are unable to foresee the consequences of their parents’ decision for home education because of their young age…. Schools represent society, and it is in the children’s interest to become part of that society. The parents’ right to educate does not go as far as to deprive their children of that experience.

As long as governments make all the decisions there can be no room for the exceptional, the unusual or the individual.

Update: NickM brings up this story at Counting Cats and in the comments IanB discusses the status of children.

Update 2: Discussion at Samizdata on Laura Dekker.

Athletics

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

What is going on with athletics? Some poor woman is being forced to undergo a humiliating set of medical tests to prove she is a woman.

Now you could argue that there should be freedom of association and an organisation can set any rules it likes and if there are to be separate competitions for men and women then that organisation can use whatever definitions and tests it wants; you are free not to take part.

But let’s assume people mean it when they proclaim values like, “…our efforts will benefit millions of youngsters around the world and encourage them to live healthier lives and compete in a true spirit of fair play and equality.”

It seems fairly obvious to me that if you set out to discover who can run fastest, you’re quite likely to find that the answer is someone at an extreme of natural variability. It’s not surprising that the fastest woman has man-like qualities. So why wail and moan about it when it happens?

What do genetic advantages mean for equality of opportunity? Do you pretend that we are all born equal and decide that anyone outside a strict set of parameters has a genetic defect and is therefore not allowed to compete? What about equality of opportunity for those people? It seems to me that people who go on about equality don’t quite know what to make of reality. Reality is unfair, and by trying to make it fair you get bizarre outcomes like humiliating someone in an minority.

Maybe the IAAF could create more categories: men, women and other. Or maybe it could accept that if you seek out the fastest runners, surprise surprise, some of them might turn out to be unusual, however annoying this might be for usual people. What it will probably do is come up with some arcane and arbitrary definition of what constitutes a woman, and somehow, because it is sport and sport is good, everyone will gloss over what, if anyone else was doing it, would be called discrimination against those who don’t quite fit in.