Archive for the ‘Civil Liberties’ Category

NYC Bridges and Tunnels

Sunday, December 5th, 2010

I am visiting NYC with my mother (it is her 60th birthday present). She is very excited about it. In the taxi from the airport, we stopped at the entrance to the Queens-Midtown tunnel to pay a toll. At that moment, my mother spotted some tall buildings in the distance and took a photo, and the flash went off.

The toll booth guy told the taxi driver to roll down the rear window. Toll booth guy says, “did someone take a picture?” My mother is holding her camera. “I see the camera”, says toll booth guy. To the taxi driver he says, “what are you supposed to tell your passengers?” Taxi driver has no idea. “You are supposed to tell them no photos of bridges or tunnels. This has been in effect since 9/11. It is an act of terrorism. You could be fined $5000 or go to jail.” He asks to see our ID. I hand him my driving license. My mother hands him her passport. He demands my passport and I hand it over. He looks at the documents, then rings his bell, and a supervisor comes over.

“Go and pull over there and talk to the lady.” To the lady, toll booth guy says, “make sure my face isn’t on that camera.”

We pull over. The lady asks to see the last photo on the camera, which is of the tall buildings in the distance but the entrance to the tunnel is also visible. She makes us delete the picture, and generally lectures us and the taxi driver, before handing back our papers.

The taxi driver is now convinced he is in big trouble and will be reported, which makes for an unpleasant ride to the hotel.

Later, I try to find reference to the law against photographing bridges and tunnels (or toll booth guys’ faces). I can’t find it. What’s going on?

I can find an NYPD document reminding officers that photography is not a crime, and some discussion of Port Authority rules. But if there is a law about this it is far from common knowledge — there is no way a tourist would know about it. So what happened?

Alan Jones on Leniency

Saturday, October 23rd, 2010

Eddie Jordan and Jake Humphrey interviewed Australian former Formula One champion Alan Jones on the BBC’s programme covering the Korean Grand Prix this morning.

Alan Jones is about as no nonsense and plain speaking as they come. He’s acting as the FIA’s fourth steward for the race this weekend. Asked whether he would swing things in favour of Mark Webber, he responded jovially, “knowing my luck there’ll be some controversy and I’ll be buggered if I do and buggered if I don’t”, for which Jake Humphrey later had to apologise to sensitive 5am BBC viewers for his “colourful Australian language”.

Anyway, Eddie Jordan asked, “When you and I were racing everything was about Europe, and now it’s all about the Middle East and Far East. Are you surprised?”

Replied Jones, “Not really, I’m not. That’s the way everything’s going at the moment. With the emerging economies of China and India, Formula One has to follow that. I think they’re doing the right thing. Europe’s getting more stringent with the rules in terms of what you can do and say and put on the car and off the car. There’s a lot more leniency in this part of the world, so to me it just makes a bit of sense.”

Indeed.


Net Privacy on China Radio International

Thursday, September 16th, 2010

China Radio International is the Chinese equivalent of BBC World Service. I recently rigged up my big shortwave radio and was surfing around the dial when I came across it.

They are trying to make it seem hip and cool by presenting a magazine show, but really you could argue that it’s a propaganda outlet for the Chinese government. Which is why I found it odd that they were discussing internet privacy. I recorded some snippets, my edits are indicated by silence.

cri-net-privacy.mp3 [4min32s] [3.12MB]

Some quotes: “We’re asking whether your privacy can be revealed. How safe are you when you are at work? [...] Can your employer read your messages? [...] Who’s watching you when you’re at work?”

“A diary is kind of out of date [compared to a blog], but it’s much safer, right?”

“You know what happened the other day? Somebody quite legally wrote a computer algorithm or program that went through lots of different Facebook pages harvesting or gathering all the personal, private information from people’s pages. And you can now buy this on a download of literally millions of pieces of data on millions of Facebook users. And it’s completely legal. And yet this is exactly the kind of infringement of people’s privacy that people have been concerned about since the Internet started.”

“Do remember: there are no secrets on the Internet.”

Beware the Internet. But don’t mind the Great Firewall Of China, I’m sure that’s *nothing* to worry about.

Feminism and Gun Control

Thursday, September 16th, 2010

Libertarian radio presenter John Wright has been defending his comments that wolf whistling at women, while tasteless, should not be a matter for the law. Complaints from his opponents included that whistling is intimidating because women don’t know if it might lead to something worse, including violence. Which gave me an idea, so I left this comment:

Above, people have complained that the wolf whistle can be intimidating, and certainly can be accompanied by more intimidating behaviour. So why is it that men can so easily intimidate women? It *doesn’t* work the other way around.

Ultimately, sexual inequality derives from men’s physical strength. Men are stronger than women, and that is why a woman might be afraid of a wolf whistle, because she fears it might lead to violence. And it is why, if that is his intent, a man feels able to be rude or intimidating to a lone woman just to get a response, because there is no danger in it. This also explains why he won’t do this when she is accompanied by a man. It is the root cause of the “unequal balance of power between the male and female genders”.

And yet, in 1836 a tool was invented that makes everyone physically equal. A tool that anyone can use. A uniquely democratic tool. And it could instantly solve all of the problems that LASH are concerned about. No longer would women fear the predations of men. No longer would men feel able to make women feel uncomfortable, comment on the appearance of strangers in public, or intimidate them.

Because Robert Heinlein was right:

“An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.”

Surely, if ever libertarians and feminists had common cause to change legislation, this is it.

Is it possible to be a feminist and in favour of gun control?

Rejecting Homeplug

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

For connecting computers together, you can’t beat Ethernet. If I had my way, I’d have Ethernet faceplates in every room, Cat 7 cable running through the cavities, and a gigabit switch in the loft. But currently I don’t own the house I’m living in, and that’s a lot of effort to go to on someone else’s house.

The first obvious solution is WiFi. But I find it’s annoying for anything more than normal web surfing. The signal comes and goes, latency is jittery, and playing twitch-based online games over WiFi is hopeless. I tried doing online racing with one of the Simbin titles a while ago and just annoyed everyone as my car jumped all over the track.

To the rescue comes Homeplug. These gadgets plug into the wall and have an network socket on them. They use the electrical wiring in your home to talk to each other, and by all accounts you can get good quality connections with them.

But there is a downside: amateur radio enthusiasts hate them because they leak radio waves all over the spectrum, including the HF band. An article in PC Pro about whether or not there was a real problem stirred up much controversy.

It does seem as if most of the problems are caused by Comtrend devices used by BT Vision. These apparently transmit continuously even when not in use. The Homeplug standard, meanwhile, only transmits when data is being sent between computers, and makes some effort to avoid certain frequencies used by radio hams.

However, radio hams are not convinced, and I am not convinced. Signal levels used for two way communications between continents are miniscule, and this activity seems to be at risk of being affected.

Why should I care about a bunch of old guys in sheds sending Morse code to each other? Lots of reasons:

First, I’m a geek, I have obscure hobbies, so I have a lot of sympathy for other people’s obscure hobbies. I’m the last person you will hear say, “why would you want to do that?”

Second, I’m a geek, and one day I might want to play around with amateur radio. Some of the equipment looks really cool. Just look at the ICOM IC-7800. That’s one hell of a gadget. Looking at that thing gets my geek juices flowing: that is a serious number of buttons and switches to learn how to use.

Third, I’m a geek, and there is something deeply cool about bouncing radio waves off the ionosphere that you just don’t get from the Internet. I have a big Grundig shortwave radio and I have listened to the Voice of Justice from Iran and it is great fun knowing that you’re picking up faint signals from a distant transmitter. Downloading a podcast from a web server half-way around the world is cool too, but it’s a different kind of cool.

Fourth, I’m a libertarian, and that means I know about stuff like homesteading and property rights. These guys were using the spectrum first, so have some rights over it. Now radio spectrum isn’t quite property, and there are ways to use it that don’t stop other people from using it at the same time so most of the government licensing of it could be replaced with technology. But as long as I am interfering with someone else’s enjoyment of a finite resource I am the bad guy, and that is certainly the case with HF communications.

So even though it is the best technology to solve my particular problem I reject Homeplug. I have just ordered a pair of WiFi N access points that will link the upstairs of my house to the downstairs. That should be as fast as Homeplug would be, and if it is too jitter for games, I will get a really long Cat 7 cable and hook that up just for games.

There is a chance that Homeplug will be widely adopted anyway, but hopefully it will remain a niche as most people just use WiFi. Niche users who are attracted to Homeplug should be aware of other people’s niches.

Think Like an Austrian #1

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

I struggle to hold my own in verbal debates with people who think radically differently to me. It’s easy to be distracted from my point by constantly having to correct misconceptions.

I keep meaning to write dialogues — imaginary debates in which I rehearse my arguments. This is a start, .

The thing about economics is most people think it’s about money supply and inflation and defecits and that there are formulae that relate these things and that the whole thing works like that computer with the pipes. This stuff is impossible to debate. The nice thing about Austrian economics is you can talk about it.

So where to start? Let me try this:

A: The government is cutting jobs in the public sector. This will ruin the economy and cause a double-dip recession.

B: You can’t spend the same money twice.

A: Yes you can, money just goes round and around.

B: What I mean is, *you* can’t spend the same money twice. Let’s say I run a cake shop. I am forced at gunpoint to give you £100. You spend that £100 on buying my cakes. How has this helped the economy?

A: There are more cakes in existence than there otherwise would be. The world is richer.

B: The number of cakes I can make is fixed. I would have sold them to someone else and I would be £100 better off. Or, I would learn that nobody wants my cakes and I would find something to make that people *do* want.

A: But if I don’t get your £100, I will be unemployed and not doing any useful work.

B: The work you do can not be very useful if you can’t get people to pay for it voluntarily.

A: The work I do in the public sector will improve the quality of the transport infrastructure, thereby enabling you to get ingredients for your cakes more cheaply.

B: Yes, but if you were unemployed, I would still have my £100. I might use it to buy a better cake-making machine that will help me make cakes more cheaply. Or I might invest it in a transport infrastructure company.

A: How is that different?

B: Well, apart from the irrelevant (for the purposes of this discussion) fact that there is less violence involved, perhaps I might be better placed to decide how to spend my £100 than you. I might be better able to cut the cost of cake-making because I understand the business of making cakes.

[At this point the discussion veers off into the question of why distributed decision making is better than centralised control. Also, the parenthesis above is why I don't think of myself as a *consequentialist* libertarian. I would be opposed to the violence even if centralised control was more efficient.]

Unintended Consequences at Sea

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

This morning I caught an interview on BBC Breakfast between a BBC journalist and a trawlerman. The item was about the high number of trawlermen who die at sea each year.

Looking down at the boat our Journalist says, “There are a lot of ropes and machinery down there, it must be easy to slip up.”

Replies the trawlerman, and I’m paraphrasing from memory: “Slipping up on deck is the least of our worries. Most men can keep their feet at sea. What’s worse is if the net snags on rocks. If the cable doesn’t break it can have the whole boat over.”

“What can be done to improve safety?”

“Very little. The job is dangerous by nature. However, as just one example, they brought out this ridiculous regulation that set stricter quotas on boats over ten meters in length than on smaller boats. So now there are a lot more small boats than there used to be, and these are more dangerous.”

Steve Hughes

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Australian comic Steve Hughes gets good about two minutes into this video when he starts talking about health and safety and political correctness.

Olympics Lanes

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Olympics lanes?!

Violent Threats Against Telecoms Companies

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

New EU rules limiting international roaming charges come into effect today. I have written about this in strong terms before. There was some idiot interviewed on the radio this morning complaining that he’d run up a huge bill by mistake while on holiday. He has no problem with asking his friends the government to threaten people with violence to save him from his own mistakes.