<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Licensing Sends False Invoice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robfisher.net/blog/archive/2003/12/10/tv-licensing-sends-false-invoice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robfisher.net/blog/archive/2003/12/10/tv-licensing-sends-false-invoice/</link>
	<description>RobFisher.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePresentOccupier</title>
		<link>http://robfisher.net/blog/archive/2003/12/10/tv-licensing-sends-false-invoice/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePresentOccupier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=174#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Update:

Unfortunately, the ASA has concluded that the fraudulent demand for immediate payment does not constitute advertising; consequently, it doesn&#039;t fall under their remit.  I shall be debating the point politely with them, as they have no rights to send me *any* material, nor do I intend to jump through their hoops only to be treated as a liar at the end of it.

Ah well.  Trading Standards are next on the list as a potential weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update:</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the ASA has concluded that the fraudulent demand for immediate payment does not constitute advertising; consequently, it doesn&#8217;t fall under their remit.  I shall be debating the point politely with them, as they have no rights to send me *any* material, nor do I intend to jump through their hoops only to be treated as a liar at the end of it.</p>
<p>Ah well.  Trading Standards are next on the list as a potential weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoop</title>
		<link>http://robfisher.net/blog/archive/2003/12/10/tv-licensing-sends-false-invoice/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>snoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=174#comment-228</guid>
		<description>What do we actually pay a licence for? is a)for all broadcasts as per the wireless telegrphy act or b) for JUST bbc products, if the latter is there a way to avoid bbc delivering thier products(as many milkmen manage to achieve every moning without threat of fines and jail!)or do i have to sacrifice Emmerdale, corrie and the bill just because i dont want to pay for the drivvel on bbc(of which i would rarely get the oppertunity to watch due to long hours at work and the missus having the remopte control even if i wanted to!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do we actually pay a licence for? is a)for all broadcasts as per the wireless telegrphy act or b) for JUST bbc products, if the latter is there a way to avoid bbc delivering thier products(as many milkmen manage to achieve every moning without threat of fines and jail!)or do i have to sacrifice Emmerdale, corrie and the bill just because i dont want to pay for the drivvel on bbc(of which i would rarely get the oppertunity to watch due to long hours at work and the missus having the remopte control even if i wanted to!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://robfisher.net/blog/archive/2003/12/10/tv-licensing-sends-false-invoice/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=174#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, according to the law, you have to buy a license to view any broadcast television, including ITV, cable and satellite.  TV Licensing like to let you think you need a license just to own a TV, but this isn&#039;t true.  You&#039;re allowed to have a TV hooked up to a DVD player, VCR or computer without needing a license, just as long as you don&#039;t view broadcast TV.

If you want to do this, I&#039;d suggest not connecting the aerial - otherwise you won&#039;t be able to prove your innocence.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, according to the law, you have to buy a license to view any broadcast television, including ITV, cable and satellite.  TV Licensing like to let you think you need a license just to own a TV, but this isn&#8217;t true.  You&#8217;re allowed to have a TV hooked up to a DVD player, VCR or computer without needing a license, just as long as you don&#8217;t view broadcast TV.</p>
<p>If you want to do this, I&#8217;d suggest not connecting the aerial &#8211; otherwise you won&#8217;t be able to prove your innocence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

